What’s Going On:

Pfizer vaccine may cause heart inflamation in people under 30, leaked study suggests

Pfizer vaccine may cause heart inflamation in people under 30, leaked study suggests

Israeli researchers found 62 cases of myocarditis, including two deaths, after recent vaccination with Pfizer. Fifty-five of the cases occurred in men — most between ages 18 and 30.
Tue Apr 27, 2021 – 12:30 pm EST
Featured Image

April 27, 2021 (Children’s Health Defense) – Details leaked from an Israeli Health Ministry report have raised concerns among experts about a possible link between the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine and myocarditis, according to The Times of Israel and other news outlets.

The preliminary report by a committee tasked with monitoring vaccine side effects found 62 cases of myocarditis, including two deaths, in people who received the Pfizer vaccine. Fifty-six of the cases occurred after the second dose of the vaccine, and 55 cases occurred in men — most between the ages of 18 and 30.

The two patients who died were reportedly healthy until receiving the vaccine and had no pre-existing conditions. One was a 22-year-old woman, the other was a 35-year-old man. The report noted that 5 million people in Israel have been vaccinated for COVID.

Myocarditis, or inflammation of the heart muscle, can lead to cardiac arrhythmia and death.

Israel’s pandemic response coordinator, Nachman Ash, confirmed  “tens of incidents” of myocarditis occurred in vaccinated people, primarily after the second dose, but emphasized the health ministry had yet to draw any conclusions.

Determining a link, Ash said, would be difficult because myocarditis, a condition that often goes away without complications, can be caused by a variety of viruses, and a similar number of cases were reported in previous years, Reuters reported.

However, according to researchers at the National Organization for Rare Disorders, myocarditis can result from infections, but “more commonly the myocarditis is a result of the body’s immune reaction to the initial heart damage.”

Israeli researchers presented their findings to the Israeli Health Ministry Director-General, Pfizer, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Asked by Reuters about the review, Pfizer said it was in regular contact with the Israeli Health Ministry to review data on its vaccine and was aware of the Israeli observations of myocarditis that occurred predominantly in young men.

“Adverse events are regularly and thoroughly reviewed and we have not observed a higher rate of myocarditis than what would be expected in the general population,” the company said. “A causal link to the vaccine has not been established. There is no evidence at this time to conclude that myocarditis is a risk associated with the use of Pfizer/BNT COVID-19 vaccine.”

Pfizer said it had not detected similar findings in the rest of the world but would look deeper into the phenomenon.

However, a search for “myocarditis” in the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System revealed 62 cases of myocarditis, with 70% occurring in people between the ages of 17 and 44. Of the reported cases, 23 were reported after the Pfizer vaccine.

Researchers who conducted the Israeli study stressed further investigation was needed to confirm a link between myocarditis and the vaccine, but added they had significant concerns. They wrote:

“At this stage, according to preliminary findings, which need further corroboration, there is an impression of a higher number than expected, especially for ages up to the age of 30. A more advanced report on the subject will be prepared soon.”

“The impression is that there is an increase in the incidence of the phenomenon especially in young men on the scale of 1:20,000 after vaccination. It is likely that the onset of myocarditis is associated with receiving the vaccine (especially the second dose).”

Experts at the health ministry are reviewing the report and will make results public. However in an interview, Ash said the benefits of the vaccine are so great that “even if we do find a connection between some of the cases and the vaccine, it won’t be justified to take any action regarding the vaccine.”

Past research suggests mRNA vaccines can cause same symptoms as COVID

According to Lyn Redwood, RN, MSN, and president emerita of Children’s Health Defense, “It is not surprising that we are seeing the same immune response resulting in myocarditis from the vaccines’ spike protein as we see in the actual infection.”

Redwood explained that mRNA vaccines work by incorporating the genetic blueprint for the key spike protein on the virus surface into a formula that — when injected into humans — instructs our own cells to make the spike protein.

“The problem with this approach is that the spike protein alone — which the mRNA vaccines instruct the body to make — has been implicated as a key cause of cardiac injury and death in people with COVID-19,” Redwood said.

According to Redwood, based on research conducted to date, it is very likely that some recipients of the spike protein mRNA vaccines will experience the same symptoms and injuries associated with the virus.

As The Defender reported Feb. 10, Dr. J. Patrick Whelan, M.D., Ph.D sought to alert the FDA about the potential for COVID vaccines to cause injuries. Specifically, Whelan was concerned that the mRNA vaccine technology utilized by Pfizer and Moderna had “the potential to cause microvascular injury (inflammation and small blood clots called microthrombi) to the brain, heart, liver and kidneys in ways that were not assessed in the safety trials.”

While Whelan did not dispute the vaccines’ potential to quickly arrest the spread of the virus (assuming the vaccines prove to actually prevent transmission — also not assessed in the clinical trials), he cautioned that “it would be vastly worse if hundreds of millions of people were to suffer long-lasting or even permanent damage to their brain or heart microvasculature as a result of failing to appreciate in the short-term an unintended effect of full-length spike protein-based vaccines on other organs.”

In October 2020, physicians warned that research demonstrated the SARS-CoV-2 virus could impact multiple organs of the body, including the heart, and that nearly a quarter of people hospitalized with COVID experience myocardial injury, such as arrhythmias or thromboembolic disease.

Dr. Hyung Chun, a Yale cardiologist, suggested that the endothelial cells lining the blood vessels potentially release inflammatory cytokines that further exacerbate the body’s inflammatory response and lead to the formation of blood clots. Chun stated: “The ‘inflamed’ endothelium likely contributes not only to worsening outcome in COVID-19, but also is considered to be an important factor contributing to risk of heart attacks and strokes.”

In a prospective study that followed 100 patients who recovered from COVID, researchers found involvement of the heart on MRI scans in 78% of patients, and ongoing myocardial inflammation in 60%. These findings were independent of the severity of the infection, overall course of the illness and time from the original diagnosis.

In October 2020, researchers took a more detailed look at the heart after death from COVID-19 and found “cardiac damage was common, but more from clotting than inflammation” and that “microthrombi (small blot clots) were frequent.”

“We did not expect this,” said study co-author Dr. Renu Virmani, of CVPath Institute in Gaithersburg, Maryland. “It seems to be unlikely that the direct viral invasion of the heart is playing a major role in making myocardial necrosis and microthrombi.”

A subsequent study published in January confirmed the findings of microthrombi resulting in myocyte necrosis, indicative of a recent myocardial infarction (heart attack), in 40 individuals who died from COVID infection — the studies also identified microthrombi as a major cause of cardiac injury.

Clinicians around the world have seen evidence suggesting the virus may cause heart inflammation, acute kidney disease, neurological malfunction, blood clots, intestinal damage and liver problems.

© April 27, 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here.

PFIZER’S CHILD COVID VACCINE TRIAL

PFIZER’S CHILD COVID VACCINE TRIAL

Just one month into the Pfizer #Covid19 vaccine study in adolescents, results have been released. Jefferey Jaxen breaks down the results of this “transparent” data published via press release.

#Pfizer #VaccineSafety #Transparency #CovidHighRisk #VaccineTrials #ChildrenTrials #DelBigtree #TheHighwire

Major vaccine ‘fact-checker’ funded by group headed by former CDC director with $1.9B in J&J stock

Major vaccine ‘fact-checker’ funded by group headed by former CDC director with $1.9B in J&J stock

U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie pointed out that a link between FACTCHECK.org’s program and the CDC’s ties to vaccine companies raises further questions.
Tue Apr 27, 2021 – 7:05 pm EST
Featured Image

LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here.

April 27, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — A U.S. congressman has highlighted the fact that a Facebook-partnered website’s COVID-19/Vaccination “fact-checking” project is funded by a group that holds $1.9 billion in Johnson & Johnson stock and is headed by the former director of the Centers for Disease Control.

U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky tweeted Saturday, “NOTHING TO SEE HERE … Former director of CDC is now CEO of the foundation that funds FACTCHECK.org’s vaccine fact checking program. Roughly 15% of said foundation’s assets are J&J stock.”

“Bless your heart if you think factcheck.org is an unbiased source of vaccine information,” he continued.

Massie attached a screenshot from Factcheck.org in which the site explains that its SciCheck “COVID-19/Vaccination Project is made possible by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation,” which it reveals is worth $53,501.

SciCheck is a section of the FactCheck website that it says “focuses exclusively on false and misleading scientific claims that are made by partisans to influence public policy.”

SciCheck has now become wholly devoted to “debunking” criticism of vaccines, masks, and other COVID-19 related concerns, attempting, for example, to refute Tucker Carlson’s questioning of the effectiveness of the vaccines.

“Vaccines benefit those who have had COVID-19, contrary to viral posts,” is the title of another recent SciCheck article.

The CEO and president of the group that funds the SciCheck arm of the FactCheck.org site, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF), is Richard E. Besser, who has led RWJF since April 2017. His bio on the RWJF website, which Massie also screenshotted, explains that “Besser is the former acting director for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.”

Besser’s bio further explains that before joining ABC News in 2009, where he was the chief health and medical director, he worked as director of the Coordinating Office for Terrorism Preparedness and Emergency Response at the CDC,” and “He also served as acting director of the CDC from January to June 2009, during which time he led the CDC’s response to the H1N1 influenza pandemic.”

The CDC, which proclaims that it “works 24/7 to protect America from health, safety and security threats,” has been frequently reproved for conflicts of interest and unethical practices that critics claim compromise its mission of promoting public health.

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) shared an editorial last year on “Bias and Disturbing Conflicts of Interest” at the CDC, and noted, “In 2016 a group of more than a dozen senior scientists at the CDC lodged an ethics complaint alleging that that the CDC was being influenced ‘by corporate and political interests in ways that shortchange taxpayers.’ They noted ‘the pervasive nature of unethical practices throughout all levels at the CDC,’” AAPS wrote.

The author of the editorial, the editor-in-chief of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, Lawrence R. Huntoon, M.D., Ph.D., concluded, “The CDC has a long history of bias and troubling conflicts of interest. This history calls into question the scientific validity of recommendations made by the CDC.”

Huntoon noted, “In 1983, the CDC became authorized to accept ‘gifts’ from industry and other private parties,” and that the creation of the non-profit CDC Foundation in 1992 “greatly expanded the CDC’s ability to accept private funding.”

“As donations to the CDC Foundation started pouring in, the door to conflicts of interest and corruption was opened wide. The CDC accepts millions of dollars in ‘conditional funding’ from entities, including pharmaceutical corporations. This funding is ‘earmarked for specific projects,’” Huntoon continued.

As an example of one such conflict of interest, Huntoon recounted how the CDC Foundation “accepted conditional funding” from the pharmaceutical and diagnostics company Roche “for the Take 3 flu campaign.” The CDC thereafter cited a study sponsored by Roche in support of its recommendation of influenza antiviral drugs (e.g. oseltamivir), claiming the study was independent. However, “All four authors had financial ties to Roche, Genentech, or Gilead (the first two sell oseltamivir and Gilead holds the patent),” Huntoon explained.

Robert Kennedy Jr. has also blasted the CDC for corruption. “The CDC is actually a vaccine company,” he told RT America in 2020.
“The CDC has a total budget of about $11 billion a year, and $5 billion of that buying vaccines from those four companies making sweetheart deals. And then they distribute those vaccines to the American public,” Kennedy said.

“The CDC also owns patents on many of the vaccines. In fact across the HHS, which is the mother agency (of) FDA, CDC and NIH, which all regulate vaccines, different parts of the vaccine industry are all parts of HHS, and those agencies are allowed to hold patents on the vaccines that their scientists work on, and then collect royalties.”

“And in fact, officials in those agencies, who worked on the vaccines, can also own part of the patent and collect royalties of up to $150,000 a year. So every bottle of Gardasil that is sold, HHS is making money on it. They make tens of millions of dollars a year.

“And these are zero liability products. No matter how toxic the ingredient, no matter how grievous your injury no matter how negligent the company, you can’t sue them. They can do anything they want with a vaccine and you can’t do anything about it,” Kennedy continued.

Interestingly, while Factcheck.org has directly denied Rep. Massie’s accusation of bias in the article, “SciCheck and our Commitment to Transparency,” it ignores the possibility of bias stemming from Besser’s former role at the CDC.

In fact, far from attempting to extricate themselves from CDC interests, they treat it as an unquestionably reliable source for their fact checking work, admitting this in the same article: “In researching claims, we rely on primary sources of information, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Food and Drug Administration and National Academy of Sciences,” they explain.

“For SciCheck articles, for example, that might mean reviewing the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports and its data on COVID-19 cases, deaths and vaccinations, as well as the FDA’s briefing document for each vaccine.”

FactCheck.org defended itself against Rep. Massie’s accusation of bias, saying, “Contrary to Massie’s suggestion, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation — as is the case with all of our funders — has no control over our editorial content. Period. Full stop.”

However, Massie nowhere says that RWJF has “control” over FactCheck.org’s editorial content. It is commonly acknowledged that outside parties can exercise influence upon an organization in a more indirect manner, such as through quid pro quo exchanges.

As Rep. Massie pointed out, FactCheck.org has also admitted in that same article that their vaccine fact-checking donor, RWJF, “reported that, as of Dec. 31, 2019, it had nearly $12 billion in total assets, including $1.9 billion in Johnson & Johnson stock.” They even share the fact that RWJF “was founded by the late Robert Wood Johnson II, who was president of Johnson & Johnson from 1932 to 1963.”

It is notable that Factcheck.org touts itself as an unbiased group dedicated to “the facts.” They describe themselves as a  “nonpartisan, nonprofit ‘consumer advocate’ for voters that aims to reduce the level of deception and confusion in U.S. politics.”

“We monitor the factual accuracy of what is said by major U.S. political players,” the site continues.

However, a cursory review of their website reveals that aside from COVID-19 related concerns, their articles overwhelmingly defend liberal partisan policies, and attempt to undercut conservative positions: “Capitol Protestors Were Armed With a Variety of Weapons,” “Bogus Claims About Biden’s Treatment of Homeless Veterans,” and “MyPillow CEO’s Video Rehashes Debunked Election Fraud Claims,” are a few articles that showcase a cross-section of the site’s content.

It is also noteworthy that FactCheck.org partnered with Facebook “shortly after the 2016” allegedly in order to “debunk hoaxes and malicious falsehoods posted on the social media site,” according to the University of Pennsylvania Almanac.

German Microbiologist: To Reduce the World’s Population, “They are Killing People with these COVID Vaccines” (Video)

German Microbiologist: To Reduce the World’s Population, “They are Killing People with these COVID Vaccines” (Video)

WRITTEN BY: 

PUBLISHED ON: APRIL 21, 2021

Here comes another leader in the scientific/medical community exposing what the experimental COVID injections are all about:  Depopulation.

The New American reports:

In this exclusive interview with The New American magazine’s Senior Editor Alex Newman, world-renown German-Thai-American microbiologist Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi warns that the COVID hysteria is based on lies and that the COVID “vaccines” are set to cause a global catastrophe and a decimation of the human population.

Starting off, he explains that the PCR test has been abused to produce fear in a way that is unscientific. Next, he explains what the mRNA vaccines are going to do to the human body in terms and using analogies that anyone can understand.

Among other concerns, he expects massive deadly clotting as well as immune system responses that will destroy the human body.

Finally, Bhakdi, who warned of impending “doom” during a Fox News interview that went viral, calls for criminal prosecutions of the people responsible and an immediate halt to this global experiment.

This is exactly what Bill Gates said would happen as a result of “vaccines.”

And he’s got a serious investment and return on that investment, which is largely comprised of stolen money by governments from their people.

And Gates doesn’t care how many people die and ignores the adverse side effects.

Keep in mind that the Mockingbird Media continues to ignore the massive amounts of reported deaths and injuries following people receiving the jabs no matter the manufacturer, who have all been given immunity for damage their products cause.

8 WAYS MRNA COVID VACCINES CAN KILL YOU – DR. SHERRI TENPENNY

𝗔𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗩𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗼

It is absolutely terrifying and all those non-profits like IRC, Catholic-Charities and such continue pushing for the jab. I spent the entire weekend interpreting for African people called by the NGOs reminding them that they need the shot and offering to make an appointment for them in one of the hundreds of shooting centers set up in churches, schools and others. It is ramping up all around the country and they insist that it should be a family outing so that kids and parents are “protected”.

U.S. Scientists Are ‘Playing God’ By Creating Bizarre Human-Animal Chimeras During Extremely Strange ‘Experiments’

U.S. Scientists Are ‘Playing God’ By Creating Bizarre Human-Animal Chimeras During Extremely Strange ‘Experiments’

Many like to point out the evil that is going on in our streets, in our boardrooms and in the halls of power in Washington, but often some of the most horrific crimes that are happening in our society are taking place in our scientific laboratories.  For years, the U.S. government funded the use of “fresh” aborted babies in experiments that created bizarre human-mouse hybrids for “scientific research” purposes.  And now we are learning that U.S. scientists have created human-monkey hybrid embryos for the first time ever.  According to NPR, these embryos were created in order “to find new ways to produce organs for people who need transplants”…

FOR THE FIRST TIME, SCIENTISTS HAVE CREATED EMBRYOS THAT ARE A MIX OF HUMAN AND MONKEY CELLS.

THE EMBRYOS, DESCRIBED THURSDAY IN THE JOURNAL CELL, WERE CREATED IN PART TO TRY TO FIND NEW WAYS TO PRODUCE ORGANS FOR PEOPLE WHO NEED TRANSPLANTS, SAID THE INTERNATIONAL TEAM OF SCIENTISTS WHO COLLABORATED IN THE WORK. BUT THE RESEARCH RAISES A VARIETY OF CONCERNS.

The demand for organ transplants is always greater than the supply, and so scientists involved in these experiments would like to find a way to increase the number of organs available.

 

For years, scientists have been creating human-sheep hybrids and human-pig hybrids in an attempt to solve this problem, but those approaches did not produce positive results. So now they are trying human-monkey hybrids. If this new method works, would they grow human-monkey hybrids to a certain size before harvesting organs for transplant? Perhaps all of this sounds unspeakably evil to you, and that is because it is unspeakably evil.

Of course every single day we do unspeakable things to animals behind closed doors, but the corporate media rarely ever talks about any of it because they support such “research”.

Let me give you another example of how incredibly sick our “scientific research” has become.

Documents that were recently uncovered by Judicial Watch prove that the U.S. government has been involved in funding experiments that used “fresh” aborted babies to create “humanized mice”

LAST WEEK, LEGAL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUP JUDICIAL WATCH DROPPED A BOMBSHELL: A NEARLY 600-PAGE REPORT PROVING THE U.S. GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN BUYING AND TRAFFICKING “FRESH” ABORTED BABY BODY PARTS. THESE BODY PARTS, PURCHASED BY THE U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION TO “HUMANIZE” MICE AND TEST BIOLOGIC DRUGS IN SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENTS, CAME FROM BABIES UP TO 24-WEEKS-OLD GESTATION, JUST WEEKS FROM BEING BORN.

Between 2012 and 2018, the FDA worked very closely with a California-based company called Advanced Bioscience Resources to procure aborted baby parts for this “research”.

In 2018, the contract was finally terminated because the Trump administration was concerned that the research might not be legal.

According to the documents, ABR received $12,000 for each “fresh” aborted baby that was successfully delivered…

EMAILS BETWEEN FDA OFFICIALS AND ABR EMPLOYEES REVEAL DISTURBING CONVERSATIONS AS THEY COLLABORATE TO BUY AND SELL ABORTED FETUSES. RECORDS INDICATE ABR WAS PAID $12,000 UPFRONT PER BABY, SOME SURVIVABLE OUT OF THE WOMB, BETWEEN THE GESTATIONAL AGE OF 16-24 WEEKS. MOST PURCHASES ARE FOR INTACT THYMUSES AND LIVERS SHIPPED “FRESH; ON WET ICE.”

We are talking about 1930s Germany kind of evil here.

And this was happening right here in the United States for years.

The FDA was specifically interested in babies that were 16 to 24 weeks old, and officials were quite insistent that the fetal tissue must never be frozen

IN THE DOCUMENTS RELEASED BY JUDICIAL WATCH, THE FDA SPECIFIES SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS FOR THE BABY BODY PARTS, INCLUDING “AGE RANGE 16-24 WEEKS” AND “TISSUE MUST BE FRESH AND NEVER FROZEN.” AS OTHER NEWS OUTLETS HAVE NOTED, HAVING FETAL TISSUE THAT WAS “NEVER FROZEN” DELIVERED TO RESEARCHERS WOULD REQUIRE ABR EMPLOYEES TO BE ON THE PREMISES OF ABORTION MILLS COLLECTING “SPECIMENS,” THE BODY PARTS OF BABIES KILLED ONLY MOMENTS BEFORE IN AN ELECTIVE ABORTION.

Since Roe v. Wade was decided in 1973, we have murdered more than 60 million American children.

As if that wasn’t bad enough, an enormous market for aborted baby parts has developed over the years.  What I am telling you about in this article is only a very small part of that market.

Those baby parts are then used in scientific experiments that are extremely sick and twisted.  In this particular instance, the aborted baby parts were used to create human-mouse hybrids.  The following comes directly from one of the emails that Judicial Watch recently acquired

THE DIVISION OF APPLIED REGULATORY SCIENCE (DARS) OCP/OTS/CDER IS CONDUCTING A RESEARCH PROGRAM TO EVALUATE THE USEFULNESS OF HUMANIZED MICE (HM) FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES.  THE HM ARE CREATED BY SURGICAL IMPLANTATION OF HUMAN TISSUE INTO MICE THAT HAVE MULTIPLE GENETIC MUTATIONS THAT BLOCK THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MOUSE IMMUNE SYSTEM AT A VERY EARLY STAGE.

THE ABSENCE OF THE MOUSE IMMUNE SYSTEM ALLOWS THE HUMAN TISSUES TO GROW AND DEVELOP INTO FUNCTIONAL HUMAN TISSUES.  AS PART OF THIS PROCESS DARS NEEDS TO REPEATEDLY ACQUIRE THE PROPER TYPE OF TISSUES.  IN ORDER FOR THE HUMANIZATION TO PROCEED CORRECTLY WE NEED TO OBTAIN FETAL TISSUE WITH A SPECIFIC SET OF SPECIALIZED CHARACTERISTICS.

If you are not emotionally moved by what I have shared with you in this article, there is a good chance that you may not still be alive.

Some of the sickest things that you can possibly imagine are going on behind closed doors in labs all over the nation, but even when details of these “experiments” are revealed to the general public there is never much of an uproar.

That is because our society as a whole is going straight down the toilet.

I don’t know if you have figured this out yet or not, but we are not “the good guys” anymore.

The United States has become an unspeakably evil nation, and our level of evil has grown with each passing year.

If we stay on the path that we are currently on, there isn’t going to be any future for America.

Now that Joe Biden is in the White House, any restrictions on federal funding for research involving human tissue will probably be lifted very rapidly.

That means that we will probably see even more bizarre experiments involving human-animal chimeras in the future, and that should deeply trouble all of us.

10,000+ deaths after COVID shots reported by U.S., European agencies

More than 7,000 deaths have occurred in Europe, and more than 200,000 injuries worldwide have been reported.
Wed Apr 14, 2021 – 7:23 pm EST
Featured Image

LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here. 

April 14, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — More than 10,000 people have died shortly after COVID-19 vaccination since December, American and European authorities have revealed. The deaths include more than 7,100 in Europe, according to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and 3,005 reported by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC).

As of Tuesday, EudraVigilance, the EMA’s database of suspected drug reaction reports, noted that 4,036 “fatal outcomes” after vaccination with Pfizer’s COVID-19 shot, as well as 1,922 and 1,234 deaths after administration of vaccines made by Moderna and AstraZeneca, respectively.

EudraVigilance also reported 20 deaths from the COVID-19 vaccine developed by Johnson & Johnson. The database has disclosed more than 200,000 injuries possibly linked to the four vaccines, with tens of thousands of cases deemed “serious.”

The U.S. government likewise has reported 3,005 deaths and more than 56,869 adverse events after coronavirus vaccinations as of April 12. Vaccine injuries in the United States are tracked by VAERS, a surveillance system overseen by the CDC and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). VAERS may only catch around one percent of all vaccine-related injuries, according to a 2010 government study, and has been sharply criticized for accessibility problems.

Among the suspected COVID-19 vaccine adverse events reports that VAERS has published, 42 percent of deaths occurred in people who fell ill within 48 hours of getting their shot. VAERS has reported thousands of other debilitating outcomes, like 620 instances of Bell’s Palsy and 110 post-vaccination miscarriages. The British government has warned against taking COVID-19 vaccines while pregnant.

The global coronavirus vaccine rollout has been dogged by numerous reports of suspicious deaths, as in Europe, where dozens of nursing home deaths prompted Chinese health experts to call for a halt in vaccinations earlier this year.

“Vaccination campaigns are apparently often carried out in nursing homes without making sure beforehand that the person affected has not already contracted an infection with which their weakened immune system has already had enough,” Dr. Frank Gunter, a German medical expert, said in response to a slew of recent deaths at a residential care facility in Germany weeks after a vaccination drive. Dr. Gunter called the deaths “not surprising” and pointed to the vaccines’ “insufficiently researched, long-term consequences.”

Similar incidents have been reported in the United States, like that of an otherwise healthy obstetrician who died of a rare blood disorder within three weeks of receiving a second dose of the Pfizer jab. The FDA and the EMA have since linked multiple coronavirus vaccines to life-threatening blood clot issues.

COVID-19 vaccines are known for disturbingly high side effect rates in general. According the FDA’s assessment of the Pfizer shot, more than 55 percent of trial participants who took the vaccine developed a headache within seven days of vaccination, and 45 percent said that they ended up needing fever or pain medication.

“I have never seen such a high frequency of adverse events for a vaccine,” Parisian infectious disease specialist Prof. Eric Caumes reacted in an interview last year. “No, really, that’s much too much, perhaps there’s a problem,” he told Le Parisien.

Both the Pfizer and Moderna jabs rely on the highly novel mRNA vaccine method, which has been flagged for untested risks of inflammatory and auto-immune diseases. “(I)t’s hard to see the side effects of the vaccine,” Dr. Louis Fouché a renowned French anesthetist, told LifeSite in December. “Often you are told within three months the case is closed. This is not true. Most important side effects occur much later.”

Every major COVID-19 vaccine has been tested on or produced with aborted babies’ cells and none of the vaccines have yet been proved to stop viral transmission, as the disgraced World Health Organization announced last week.

Virtually all healthy people who contract coronavirus survive, especially with certain treatment regimens. Around 190 million COVID-19 vaccine doses nevertheless have been administered in the United States, in addition to over 100 million in Europe so far.

Slowly But Surely, The Truth Is Coming Out

Slowly But Surely, The Truth Is Coming Out

Authored by Michael Snyder via TheMostImportantNews.com,

Don’t you hate it when what you get turns out to be far different from what you were promised?  In this article, I am only going to share facts that have been documented by corporate media sources.  These facts are going to upset a lot of people, because they prove that much of what we had been promised didn’t turn out to be true.  So many people that I know were convinced that if they just got their two shots they would be 100 percent protected for the rest of their lives and they would never have to be concerned about getting COVID ever again.  In addition, most Americans still seem to believe that if a high enough percentage of the population gets their shots COVID will be defeated and the pandemic will be brought to an end.  Unfortunately, all of those assumptions have turned out to be dead wrong.

If you don’t want to believe me, perhaps you will believe the CEO of Pfizer.  This week, he admitted that “fully vaccinated” people will need a third shot of the vaccine within 12 months

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said people will “likely” need a third dose of a Covid-19 vaccine within 12 months of getting fully vaccinated. His comments were made public Thursday but were taped April 1.

Bourla said it’s possible people will need to get vaccinated against the coronavirus annually.

From the very beginning of this crisis, I have been warning my readers that any immunity would be very temporary.  Natural COVID immunity is very temporary, and immunity conferred by the vaccines is very temporary too.

The CEO of Pfizer is comparing the COVID vaccines to flu shots.  Every year millions of Americans rush out to get their flu shots, and the CEO of Pfizer is admitting that it looks like the COVID vaccines will be on a similar schedule

“There are vaccines that’s like polio that one dose is enough, there are vaccines like pneumococcal vaccine that one dose is enough for adults and there are vaccines like flu that you need every year,” Bourla said. “The Covid virus looks more like the influenza virus than the polio virus.”

If people are going to need a new shot every year, that means that COVID will be with us for a very long time to come.

This is essentially an admission that the COVID pandemic will not be ending any time soon.

Needless to say, Pfizer stands to make giant mountains of money if COVID vaccines become a yearly thing, and we need to keep that in mind.

A lot of people that I know are going to be extremely upset when they finally realize that the two shots that they got only provide temporary immunity.

And of course lots of people are still getting sick after being fully vaccinated.  According to the CDC, so far there have been almost 6,000 documented cases of people being infected after getting two shots, and dozens of them have died

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has reported that roughly 5,800 people who received a coronavirus vaccine still ultimately came down with the disease anyway, according to CNN.

Of those 5,800, 396 of them (roughly 7 percent) were hospitalized; 74 of the vaccinated people ultimately died. The report proves that the vaccines, though frequently touted by the government and the media, are not guaranteed to prevent everyone from contracting the virus.

That wasn’t supposed to happen.

But it is happening.

Meanwhile, there is a lot of uncertainty about how the current vaccines will fare against variants that have already developed and variants that will develop in the future.

At this point we just don’t know how effective the vaccines will be, but the New York Times is assuring us that we don’t have anything to be concerned about…

“I use the term ‘scariants,’” said Dr. Eric Topol, professor of molecular medicine at Scripps Research in La Jolla, Calif., referring to much of the media coverage of the variants.

“Even my wife was saying, ‘What about this double mutant?’ It drives me nuts. People are scared unnecessarily. If you’re fully vaccinated, two weeks post dose, you shouldn’t have to worry about variants at all.”

Really?

I have a feeling that Dr. Eric Topol will end up eating those words.

The reason why a new flu vaccine comes out every year is because the flu is constantly changing and mutating.

The same thing is happening to COVID, and there are already dozens of mutant variations spreading around the globe.

To me, Dr. Eric Topol’s statement was exceedingly irresponsible, especially considering some of the studies that have come out lately.  Here is just one example

Two doses of the AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine were found to have only a 10.4% efficacy against mild-to-moderate infections caused by the B.1.351 South Africa variant, according to a phase 1b-2 clinical trial published on Tuesday in the New England Journal of Medicine. This is a cause for grave concern as the South African variants share similar mutations to the other variants leaving those vaccinated with the AstraZeneca vaccine potentially exposed to multiple variants.

In this article, I haven’t even discussed all of the side effects that we have been witnessing.  A few days ago, the FDA issued an unprecedented order regarding the Johnson and Johnson vaccine because it was causing blood clots in a number of cases…

This week, the Food and Drug Administration called for a halt in the administration of the single dose vaccine for COVID-19 manufactured by Johnson and Johnson. The halt was ascribed to the rare incidence of blood clots that could potentially be related to the vaccine.

I am glad that the FDA decided to step in, but the order came too late for this guy

When the news broke about the pause of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine Tuesday, one Coast family was already living with a tragedy they believe was caused by the vaccine.

It started out as a normal day for 43-year-old Brad Malagarie of St. Martin. This busy father of seven spent the morning at his D’Iberville office before heading to get a Johnson & Johnson vaccine a little after noon.

He returned to work, and within three hours coworkers noticed he was unresponsive at his desk.

It shouldn’t be controversial to say that rushing experimental vaccines through the testing process was a really bad idea.

We should be putting the safety of the American people first, and nobody knows for sure what the long-term effects of these experimental treatments will be.

In this day and age, we all need to do our own research and we all need to think for ourselves, because the big pharmaceutical companies are more concerned with profits than anything else.

If you are harmed by their experimental therapies, the big pharmaceutical companies won’t be there to pick up the pieces for you if something goes horribly wrong.