What’s Going On:

Cleveland Clinic Refutes Fauci: No Point Vaccinating Those Who’ve Had COVID-19

A new study by scientists at the Cleveland Clinic found that there was no point in vaccinating those who’ve had the COVDI019 already.

This makes logical sense and is in line with what the public was always told about infectious disease.

It was only when the megalomaniac Tony Fauci got involved with COVID-19 that healthy people were wearing masks, the entire economy was shut down, the death counts included people who died from the disease and with the disease, and those who had the disease were ordered to get the vaccine.

This study brings a bit of sanity back into the American medical community.

TRENDING: Medical Journal Labels “Whiteness” a “Malignant, Parasitic-like Condition” and there is “Not Yet a Permanent Cure”

News-Medical.net reported:

Scientists from the Cleveland Clinic, USA, have recently evaluated the effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 COVID-19) vaccination among individuals with or without a history of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.

The study findings reveal that individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection do not get additional benefits from vaccination, indicating that COVID-19 vaccines should be prioritized to individuals without prior infection. The study is currently available on the medRxiv* preprint server.

In the United States, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved two mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines developed by Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna, which have shown high efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease in clinical trials. However, the ability to vaccinate a large part of the global population is limited by vaccine supply.

In order to ensure fair access to vaccines throughout the world, the COVID-19 vaccines Global Access (COVAX) initiative was launched. In many countries, especially those with low socioeconomic status, there is a serious shortage of vaccines. Thus, in order to get the maximum vaccine benefits, the most vulnerable population should be prioritized for the vaccination.

The Changing of a Long-Used Rubric for Classifying Mortality Boosted COVID Numbers

As with all things COVID, the reality of the matter is not as it appears. This now relates to the overall mortality rate which has been found to be inflated because of the employment of a new mortality classification rubric enacted for the pandemic.

The number of COVID-attributed deaths in Alameda County, California, fell by about 25 percent after authorities there changed their methodology for counting total mortality. The change in accounting had them removing deaths that weren’t a “direct result” of the disease or “in whom death caused by COVID-19 could not be ruled out.”

The county’s COVID mortality count, following the change, shows that 1,223 deaths were caused by the virus, 411 fewer than it previously reported; almost 25 percent.

“Alameda County previously included any person who died while infected with the virus in the total COVID deaths for the County,” the county’s public health department said in a statement.

Why This Is Important

It is a sad day when a trusted organization like the Center for Disease Control & Prevention must be questioned at every turn. But this is exactly what is required when a governmental agency, department of organization becomes politicized. Thanks to Dr. Fauci and those who supported his political agenda at the Center, this is, in fact, the case.

The CDC changed their cause of death coding criteria retroactively for the COVID pandemic. A study by medical professionals at the ChildrensHealthDefense.org dated July of 2020 concluded: “The CDC has instructed hospitals, medical examiners, coroners, and physicians to collect and report COVID-19 data by significantly different standards than all other infectious diseases and causes of death.

These new and unnecessary guidelines were instituted by the CDC in private, and without open discussion among qualified professionals that are free from conflicts of interest. These new and unnecessary guidelines were additionally instituted despite the existence of effective rules for data collection and reporting, successfully used by all hospitals, medical examiners, coroners, and physicians for more than 17 years.” A memorandum from the Iowa Department of Public Health dated December of 2020, chronicled the retroactive change to date back to March of that year: The new methodology will be applied retroactively to deaths reported to the state since March and will result in an increase in the number of Iowans whose deaths are attributed to COVID-19…”

And now, in hindsight, we are seeing counties starting to come clean in their COVID mortality reporting and coming to understand that the numbers of deaths due exclusively to COVID were grossly over-reported, the politicians on the Left and the media – and especially social media – running with the fear-mongering false narrative. This fear-mongering crashed an economy, cost children a year of education, killed small businesses, depleted families’ savings, and set our economy up for hyper-inflation, yet no one seems ready to tar and feather those responsible for this purely political move.

While the media and the Biden administration try to quietly advance the idea that China should be held accountable, what about the opportunistic political class here in the United States that stoked fear to win an election? Will they be held accountable and if not, why? And if not, who will be making the decision to give them a pass. We’d like names, please.

TEXAS HOSPITAL ORDERS NURSES NOT TO RECORD VACCINE SIDE EFFECTS!

THERE ARE A LOT OF PEOPLE IN THE HEALTHCARE FIELD THAT WANT TO DO RIGHT FOR THEIR PATIENTS UNDER THEIR CARE AND THAT MEANS REPORTING SIDE EFFECTS FROM DRUGS OR PROCEDURES THEY HAVE BEEN GIVEN.
HOWEVER, IN A WORLD WHERE THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA IS BUSY CONVINCING THE MASSES THAT THE EXPERIMENTAL JAB IS THE BEST THING SLICED BREAD SO MORE RECEIVE IT, THAT IS A BIG NO-NO.
IN FACT, THERE ARE REPORTS THAT INDICATE OVER 100 EMPLOYEES OF HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL SUED THE HOSPITAL FOR MANDATING THE EXPERIMENTAL VACCINE FOR ALL STAFF MEMBERS.
IF YOU WERE NOT AWARE, HOUSTON METHODIST WAS THE FIRST MEDICAL CENTER IN THE COUNTRY TO MANDATE THE EXPERIMENTAL JAB FOR THEIR EMPLOYEES.

 

 

 

Now there are new reports being revealed that are putting the already embattled hospital in more hot water.

In an interview with Del Bigtree from The Highwire, nurse Jennifer Bridges made disturbing revelations about Houston Methodist.

 

 

 

Check out a small clip of the interview here.

National File reported:

Houston Methodist Hospital is forbidding its workers from listing any adverse reactions to the Coronavirus vaccine on official records, according to a Houston Methodist nurse. Nurse Jennifer Bridges appeared on The Highwire with Del Bigree to drop the shocking revelation.

 

“But every time a nurse or another employee comes out with an adverse reaction, they basically tell them in the ER, they’re like, ‘No, it’s not an adverse reaction. This is just an intolerance.’ And they don’t report it properly and they don’t address it properly,” Jennifer Bridges told Del Bigtree.

“And I’ve actually been in contact with somebody in the hospital system that deals with, like, the charting and the finalization of people’s charts…They have told me that officially Methodist has told them, ‘Do not list any adverse reactions on anybody’s chart related to the vaccine.’ Like, people are being told to not talk about this, not address it, and not label it on charts basically. Like, us ourselves as employees, have to go to the system and document these adverse reactions because Methodist is not doing it,” nurse Jennifer Bridges told Bigtree.

117 Houston Methodist employees are reportedly suing the hospital to fight the institution’s vaccine mandate.

If this is a common trend, then there’s no telling the true number of experimental vaccine recipients that suffer from side effects.

The official VAERS Report could only be a fraction of the real number of adverse reactions.

Oxford Study Reports No Bats Or Pangolins Were Sold In The Wuhan Wet Market

A man walking at the Wuhan Baishazhou Market in Wuhan in China's central Hubei province. (Photo by HECTOR RETAMAL/AFP via Getty Images)

A man walking at the Wuhan Baishazhou Market in Wuhan in China’s central Hubei province. (Photo by HECTOR RETAMAL/AFP via Getty Images)

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 6:03 PM PT – Tuesday, June 8, 2021

A new study by Oxford University has discovered there were no bats or pangolins sold in the Wuhan wet market. In fact, the study reported no bats or pangolins were found anywhere around Wuhan at the beginning of the Coronavirus outbreak.

Through their investigations, the scientists are believed to have effectively debunked the natural origin argument. China and Dr. Anthony Fauci have long claimed COVID-19 jumped from a bat to a pangolin, which was then sold at the wet market, leading to the spread among humans. However, recent studies have shown the virus likely originated in a lab.

 

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) laid out evidence describing thousands of animals that have been tested in the wet market, with none of them infected with COVID-19.

“When you take COVID-19 and you try to infect bats, which is where most coronaviruses come from, what do you discover? You discover that COVID-19 is actually not very well infected in bats,” he explained. “The bats don’t catch it very easily. It seems as if COVID-19 is most adapted for humans.”

The Oxford study also reported that Chinese people rarely consume bats and the nearest natural habitat of bats is 1,500 miles away from Wuhan.

Scientists Believe they Have ‘Smoking Gun’ for Wuhan Gain-of-Function Research Causing COVID-19

The Wuhan lab “conspiracy theory” is on the verge of becoming “conspiracy fact.” Scientific researchers who have peeled open the RNA structure of the novel coronavirus believe they have detected genetic sequences that are “almost certainly” unnatural.

The Wall Street Journal appears to have cracked the case on Sunday by contacting researchers who believe the sequences could not have arisen from nature, all speculation that “bat soup” and “wet markets” were the originators aside.

The essay in WSJ said that “much of the public discussion has focused on circumstantial evidence: mysterious illnesses in late 2019; the lab’s work intentionally supercharging viruses to increase lethality (known as ‘gain of function’ research).”

“The Chinese Communist Party has been reluctant to release relevant information,” it adds. “Reports based on US intelligence have suggested the lab collaborated on projects with the Chinese military.”

“But the most compelling reason to favor the lab leak hypothesis is firmly based in science. In particular, consider the genetic fingerprint of CoV-2, the novel coronavirus responsible for the disease Covid-19,” the report added.

SARS-CoV-2’s genetic sequencing ‘almost certainly’ demonstrates that it is an artificially-manipulated virus developed in a laboratory, the scientists say.

“The CGG-CGG combination has never been found naturally. That means the common method of viruses picking up new skills, called recombination, cannot operate here,” they wrote in the WSJ.

“A virus simply cannot pick up a sequence from another virus if that sequence isn’t present in any other virus.”

C and G stand for Cytosine and Guanine, two amino acids that are building blocks in Ribonucleic acid (RNA). Along with Adenine and Uracil, their sequencing is much like an extremely complex code that is unique to each particular organism. In Deoxyrobonucleic acid (DNA), Thymine is found instead of Uracil.

“At the minimum, this fact – that the coronavirus, with all its random possibilities, took the rare and unnatural combination used by human researchers – implies that the leading theory for the origin of the coronavirus must be laboratory escape,” the scientists added.

WSJ noted the implications for the research in an Opinion piece published on Sunday.

“In gain-of-function research, a microbiologist can increase the lethality of a coronavirus enormously by splicing a special sequence into its genome at a prime location. Doing this leaves no trace of manipulation,” the piece said. “But it alters the virus spike protein, rendering it easier for the virus to inject genetic material into the victim cell. Since 1992 there have been at least 11 separate experiments adding a special sequence to the same location. The end result has always been supercharged viruses.”

The bioweapon applications of such dangerous research are obvious. The National Institutes of Health, and the NIAID run by Dr. Anthony Fauci, have nonetheless denied accountability for the research conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, despite providing it with millions of dollars of taxpayer funding through the group EcoHealth Alliance. The Chinese military could potentially weaponize or exploit the coronavirus research.

On Friday, a report revealed that the Department of Defense was instrumental in U.S. funding of the Wuhan lab’s risky research. The Pentagon “funneled” $39 million to EcoHealth Alliance, the Fauci-connected “charity” group that disbursed research funding to the Wuhan Institute for Virology. The lab is believed to be a plausible source of the COVID-19 outbreak that has sickened and killed millions worldwide.

The data that show the Department of Defense and other U.S. agencies provided funds to the EcoHealth Alliance group was obtained by the Daily Mail and published on Friday.

“The Pentagon gave $39 million to a charity that funded controversial coronavirus research at a Chinese lab accused of being the source for Covid-19, federal data reveals,” the report said.

“[F]ederal grant data assembled by independent researchers shows that the charity has received more than $123 million from the government – from 2017 to 2020 – and that one of its biggest funders is the Department of Defense, funneling almost $39 million to the organization since 2013,” the report said.

The accumulating evidence that the COVID-19 pandemic was not only covered up by the Chinese, but also may have originated in the Wuhan lab, is building up into a monumental scandal that threatens to blow the lid off of Americans’ belief in its scientific community and its defense agencies.

The U.S. Congress is obligated to begin extremely serious and thorough public inquiries immediately.

Fauci lied, millions died: The conspiracy behind hydroxychloroquine’s suppression

Image: Fauci lied, millions died: The conspiracy behind hydroxychloroquine’s suppression

(Natural News) Another email bombshell from the Anthony Fauci archives has been dropped, this one showing that “America’s doctor” knew full well that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was an effective remedy against the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19), and yet chose to lie to the public by claiming otherwise.

Not only that, but Fauci colluded with other deep state entities to ban HCQ from even being allowed as an “approved” treatment for the Chinese Virus, even though numerous studies prove it to be an effective remedy against all sorts of coronaviruses.

Fifteen years ago, Fauci himself was a strong proponent of HCQ, having indicated before it was politically incorrect to do so that HCQ works against SARS, a cousin of the Wuhan Flu.

Chloroquine, Fauci admitted back in 2005, “completely abolished SARS-CoV infection.” For whatever reason, the story changed in 2020 when SARS-CoV-2 (covid) emerged when Fauci suddenly decided that HCQ and its derivatives could not be used in the treatment of Chinese Disease.

In response to a Feb. 24, 2020, inquiry, Fauci was dismissive about the potential benefits of HCQ in early treatment of the Wuhan Flu.

“Is there any indication / data to substantiate this claim from China (attached publication) that chloroquine / hydroxychloroquine can decrease COVID-19 infections and lung disease?” wrote Maryland pharmacologist Philip Gatti in an email to Fauci.

“There are no data in this brief report and so I have no way of evaluating their claim,” Fauci responded. “There are a lot of these types of claims going around. I would love to see their data.”

Fauci doubled down with deception by claiming that hydroxychloroquine is “dangerous”

After being presented with the data, Fauci proceeded to double down on his claim that HCQ was ineffective against the Chinese Virus, even going so far as to claim that the use of it was “dangerous.”

During an appearance on CNN last spring, Fauci warned the network’s handful of viewers that using HCQ prophylactically like then-President Donald Trump had done was dangerous, despite the fact that the drug has been used for decades without issue.

It would seem as though Fauci only wanted to contradict Trump rather than inform Americans as to a safe and effective remedy for the Chinese Flu. Because Trump was for HCQ, Fauci stood against it, proving his loyalty to politics rather than medicine.

Millions of people are now dead, thanks to Fauci’s bad advice. Big Tech followed suit by further censoring all information about HCQ from social media, and much of the world was plunged into lockdowns, mask mandates, and business closures – all because of Fauci’s lies.

Keep in mind that back in 2013, Fauci promoted the use of HCQ in the treatment of MERS, another type of coronavirus similar to SARS and the Wuhan Flu. What changed since that time? Trump became president, is the simplest answer.

“When the history books are written Dr. Tony Fauci will go down as one of the greatest mass murderers of our day,” writes Jim Hoft for The Gateway Pundit.

“He funded the research on coronavirus in the U.S. Then he funded it in China after it was banned here. Then he downplayed the severity of the disease. Then he lied about a successful treatment for the dangerous man-made pathogen. Fauci is a killer. Arrest Fauci.”

One wonders where Fauci is hiding these days as the lid is blown on this whole scandal. Fauci is quickly becoming the most hated figure on the planet, even more so, perhaps, than billionaire eugenicist Bill Gates. The good news is that justice is coming for all of them eventually.

Ex-CDC Chief Got Death Threats From Scientists for Lab Leak Theory

robert redfield speaks during a press conference

Former Centers for Disease Control Director Robert Redfield on Thursday told Vanity Fair he received death threats from other scientists for saying he suspected COVID-19 originated in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Redfield told Vanity Fair the death threats came after he told CNN in March, “I am of the point of view that I still think the most likely etiology of this pathogen in Wuhan was from a laboratory, you know, escaped.”

“I was threatened and ostracized because I proposed another hypothesis,” Redfield, a virologist by trade, told the magazine. “I expected it from politicians. I didn’t expect it from science.”

Once dismissed as a conspiracy theory, the idea the novel coronavirus escaped from the Wuhan lab is gaining attention. Vanity Fair’s report claims the U.S. government stood in the way of even discussing the theory.

Former assistant Secretary of State Thomas DiNanno, a Trump appointee, alleged that staff within the department had warned leaders “not to pursue an investigation into the origin of COVID-19” because it could “open a can of worms.”

In another document dated Dec. 9, an official warned colleagues not to ask questions about Wuhan labs’ coronavirus research, as it would call attention to U.S. government support for that research.

The warnings “smelled like a cover-up,” DiNanno told Vanity Fair, “and I wasn’t going to be part of it.”

David Asher, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute who ran the State Department’s day-to-day COVID-19 origins inquiry told the news outlet it became clear that “there is a huge gain-of-function bureaucracy” inside the federal government.

A former U.S. health official told Vanity Fair it was too coincidental an institute “funded by American dollars is trying to teach a bat virus to infect human cells, then there is a virus” in the same Chinese city.

The official told the magazine it was “not being intellectually honest not to consider the hypothesis” of a lab leak of COVID-19.

Even Vanity Fair’s report admitted its bias against views shared by former President Donald Trump or those who were appointed by him, like Redfield.

“With President Trump out of office, it should be possible to reject his xenophobic agenda and still ask why, in all places in the world, did the outbreak begin in the city with a laboratory housing one of the world’s most extensive collection of bat viruses, doing some of the most aggressive research?” Vanity Fair wrote.

Rutgers University’s Dr. Richard Ebright told Vanity Fair it took him “‘a nanosecond or a picosecond” to suspect the link to the WIV, noting bat coronavirus research was done in “three places” – Wuhan, China; Galveston, Texas; and Chapel Hill, North Carolina – and “not a dozen cities.”

President Joe Biden last week directed the U.S. intelligence community to redouble their efforts in investigating the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic and report back to him in 90 days.

Dr. Judy Mikovits warns spike protein “vaccine” injections may kill 50 million Americans

NaturalNews videos would not be possible without you, as always we remain passionately dedicated to our mission of educating people all over the world on the subject of natural healing remedies and personal liberty (food freedom, medical freedom, the freedom of speech, etc.). Together, we’re helping create a better world, with more honest food labeling, reduced chemical contamination, the avoidance of toxic heavy metals and vastly increased scientific transparency.