EcoHealth Alliance, the non-profit organization funded by Dr. Anthony Fauci’s NIAID, is directly tied to the gain-of-function research at the Wuhan laboratory, located close to the epicenter of the Covid pandemic’s origins.

“Dr. Andrew Huff, former vice president of EcoHealth Alliance, claims to have had a ringside seat to what he brands one of the greatest cover-ups in history – and the ‘biggest U.S. intelligence failure since 9/11’,” the Sun-Times reported on Saturday.

“In his new book – The Truth About Wuhan – whistleblower Dr. Huff claims the pandemic was the result of the U.S. government’s funding of dangerous genetic engineering of coronaviruses in China,” the Times notes. “The epidemiologist said China’s gain-of-function experiments – carried out with shoddy biosecurity – led to a lab leak at the US-funded Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

“EcoHealth Alliance and foreign laboratories did not have the adequate control measures in place for ensuring proper biosafety, biosecurity, and risk management, ultimately resulting in the lab leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” he said in his book, an exclusive pre-release copy of which was provided to The Sun Online.

Dr. Huff worked at EcoHealth Alliance from 2014 to 2016 and served as vice president from 2015. He worked on the classified side of the research program as a U.S. government scientist. He revealed that EcoHealth Alliance taught the Wuhan lab the “best existing methods to engineer bat coronaviruses to attack other species.” He also claimed, “China knew from day one that this was a genetically engineered agent.”

“The U.S. government is to blame for the transfer of dangerous biotechnology to the Chinese,” he said. “I was terrified by what I saw. We were just handing them bioweapon technology,” he added.

The Sun-Times report notes that former intelligence chiefs and diplomats have claimed that Covid leaking from the Wuhan lab is the “cover-up of the century.”

Dr. Huff said: “Nobody should be surprised that the Chinese lied about the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 and then went to extraordinary lengths to make it appear as if the disease naturally emerged.”

“The shocking part of all of this is how the United States government lied to all of us,” he added.

Dr. Anthony Fauci is one of the government officials who lied to the American people about his ties to the EcoHealth Alliance and, thus, to funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan laboratory.

In October 2021, the National Institutes of Health quietly corrected the record regarding several misstatements by Dr. Anthony Fauci regarding the NIH funding of gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The Board of Governors Professor of Chemistry and Chemical Biology Richard H. Ebright noted the admission.

“NIH corrects untruthful assertions by NIH Director Collins and NIAID Director Fauci that NIH had not funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan,” Professor Ebright notes. “NIH states that EcoHealth Alliance violated Terms and Conditions of NIH grant AI110964.”

But Ebright points out that NIH knew about the documents in 2018 and reviewed them repeatedly.

“The NIH received the relevant documents in 2018 and reviewed the documents in 2020 and again in 2021,” Ebright said. “The NIH–specifically, Collins, Fauci, and Tabak–lied to Congress, lied to the press, and lied to the public. Knowingly. Willfully. Brazenly.”

The final motion to stop the “Pfizergate” Covid vaccine fraud case from being dismissed has been submitted, so it’s “all up to the judge now.” This is according to the whistleblower in the case, Brook Jackson, who provided the court documents and spoke to Becker News.

In the lawsuit, “United States of America ex rel. Brook Jackson” against the Pfizer contractor Ventavia Research Group, the whistleblower’s lawsuit alleges, “Payment was contingent upon the vaccine receiving emergency use authorization (‘EUA’) and that the FDA in making that decision was reliant upon the accuracy of the data produced in the clinical trials. If, as Relator witnessed and alleges, the clinical trial protocol was egregiously broken, then the very basis upon which the EUA was granted would be irrelevant.”

“The government initially recognized the merits of Relator’s claims,” the motion argues. “The government made several requests to extend its deadline to either intervene or allow Relator to continue independently, ultimately deliberating for nearly a year prior to the unsealing of this action. Had the government truly believed at the time, as they now try to claim, that Relator’s complaint was devoid of evidence, they would never have required such ample time to investigate. Clearly, the government had an interest in her allegations upon the initial filing of this action.”

The lawsuit rebuts the defense that the standard for dismissal is not actuality but materiality to the decision-making.

“The United States claims the inference must be that the violations at the Ventavia site ‘actually’ altered the FDA’s decision, but the FCA pleading standard is not one of actuality but of materiality (imposing liability under the FCA on any person who ‘knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim’),” the motion adds. “Whether a false statement is material depends on whether the false statement has a ‘natural tendency to influence, or is capable of influencing, the decision of the decision-making body to which it was addressed.’”

“Clinical trial fraud is not only a sound basis for a FCA claim, it is also the basis for criminal charges,” the motion adds.

Jackson, a former clinical trial auditor with more than 15 years’ experience in clinical research coordination and management, makes the following serious claims about the Pfizer contractor Ventavia’s clinical trials:

Clinical trial participants were given their second injection outside the protocol-mandated nineteen-to-twenty-three-day window. On at least four occasions, the vaccine concentrate was over-diluted, directly affecting potency and reducing potential side effects.

Ventavia failed to report Serious Adverse Events (“SAEs”) to Pfizer and Icon. However, that information was available via the clinical trial participants’ “electronic diary” entries. This is perhaps the most egregious violation of clinical trial protocol and public trust.

Ventavia’s documentation practices were careless, sloppy, inaccurate, and often falsified. Pfizer had access to this data and equally failed its oversight responsibilities which rightfully draws the presumption that data from other clinical trials are just as bad, if not worse.

As reported earlier at Becker News, Brook Jackson was given until October 27, 2022, to respond to the defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the case, which cites the False Claims Act.

“It’s all up to the judge now,” Jackson told Becker News, noting that there is now two options. “1. He allows us to move forward with discovery. 2. Dismissed.”

This is one of the last opportunities for the American people to get transparency and accountability against Big Pharma for the false claims about the Covid-19 vaccines.

The Washington Post offloaded a blockbuster analysis over the holiday break. It’s the first time a mainstream publication acknowledged that the majority of Americans dying from Covid-19 were at one point considered “fully vaccinated.”

“For the first time, a majority of Americans dying from the coronavirus received at least the primary series of the vaccine,” the Post analysis conceded.

“Fifty-eight percent of coronavirus deaths in August were people who were vaccinated or boosted, according to an analysis conducted for The Health 202 by Cynthia Cox, Vice President at the Kaiser Family Foundation.”

Furthermore, the article acknowledged that a significant number of the “vaccinated” were Covid-related deaths going back to September 2021.

“It’s a continuation of a troubling trend that has emerged over the past year,” the Post analysis continued. “As vaccination rates have increased and new variants appeared, the share of deaths of people who were vaccinated has been steadily rising. In September 2021, vaccinated people made up just 23 percent of coronavirus fatalities. In January and February this year, it was up to 42 percent, per our colleagues Fenit Nirappil and Dan Keating.”

That surge to the “vaccinated” representing one-quarter of all Covid-related deaths occurred just weeks after the Delta variant case spike in August. Thus, the Covid-19 vaccines did not live up to the “100% safe and effective” hype for even one year after the initial series. It is a pattern more consistent with “flu shots” than actual “vaccines” that prevent infection and transmission.

The “100% safe and effective” lie actually originated in 2021. However, this soon became “95% safe and effective,” as a February 2021 Reason story explained.

“The COVID-19 vaccines developed by Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna are about 95 percent effective at preventing symptomatic illness,” author Ronald Bailey claimed. “What does that really mean? It does not mean that 95 percent of people are protected from disease with the vaccine, as Oxford Centre for Global Health Research infectious disease specialist Piero Olliaro recently explained in the Lancet. Olliaro notes that an earlier ambiguous editorial in the Lancet may have led readers to make just such a mistaken inference.”

“What the 95 percent figure really means here is that vaccinated people in the clinical trials had a 95 percent lower risk of getting COVID-19 compared with the unvaccinated control group participants. That means that vaccinated people were 20 times less likely than the control group to get COVID-19.”

“Olliaro looked at what a 95 percent vaccine efficacy rate would mean in a hypothetical case in which a population of 100,000 people have all been vaccinated,” he added.

“Applying the 1 percent rate at which unvaccinated folks became ill during the vaccine trials over three months suggests that 1,000 people in an unvaccinated population of 100,000 would fall ill. But because all 100,000 people are vaccinated, the actual rate in the vaccinated population would be just 50 cases (0.05 x 1,000 = 50 cases).”

It is important to note that the Washington Post story above explodes the “100% safe and effective” myth well before September 2021.

It is nearly three years after the onset of the coronavirus pandemic and two years after the novel mRNA Covid “vaccines” were first introduced. Yet, the excess mortality rate — the most critical indicator for the effectiveness of pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) — remains above baseline.

This simply should not be happening if the Covid vaccines were even 95% “safe and effective,” lockdowns actually protected people, and masks stopped the spread.

Dr. Jha, the White House’s Covid coordinator, nonetheless misled Americans in a press conference on Tuesday, claiming that vaccination and boosters could prevent every Covid-related death in America.

In one of his last press conferences at the White House, Dr. Fauci claimed that the “real danger” in America is people not being “vaccinated.”

As the CDC pointed out, over 95% of Americans have protection against Covid-19. The currently predominant BA.4 and BA.5 variants are far less deadly than earlier strains, and an estimated 97% of Americans have natural immunity from prior infection, according to CDC data.

The Experts’ false claims about the “vaccines” preventing Covid-19 deaths have now been completely exposed for the world to see. The White House can continue to lie to Americans’ faces about the Covid shots. Still, informed news consumers can look no further than the mainstream media to finally get the truth.

Says study suggests 3 doses 80 percent effective in preventing symptomatic COVID-19

Pfizer and BioNTech have completed an application for emergency use authorization (EUA) to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for a three-dose COVID-19 vaccine regimen for children aged 6 months to under 5 years old.

Pfizer announced the completion of its EUA application on Wednesday, reported multiple outlets.

The companies initially asked the FDA for an EUA in February for a two-dose regimen of its 3-µg COVID-19 vaccine for the age group, but the agency on Feb. 11 postponed its decision on the application until receiving data on three doses. On the same day, Pfizer-BioNTech announced it would delay completing its EUA request until it receives data on the third dose.

The 3-µg dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for the under-5 age group is one-tenth of the dose adults receive (30 µg) and one-third of that given to children aged 5–11 (10 µg).

The FDA has since accepted the application to review the data from Pfizer-BioNTech, reported ABC News. The agency said Wednesday it will review the EUA request “as quickly as possible using a science-based approach.”

Pfizer noted in a statement on May 23 that it has gathered “safety, immunogenicity, and vaccine efficacy data” from its Phase 2/3 trial. The trial showed that a third 3-µg dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine “elicited a strong immune response, with a favorable safety profile similar to placebo” in children 6 months to under 5 years of age, Pfizer said.

The vaccine was also 80.3 percent effective in preventing COVID-19 symptoms according to the study, the companies stated. They noted that the figure is based on 10 symptomatic COVID-19 cases “from seven days after the third dose and accrued as of April 29, 2022.”

At least 21 cases are needed to formally determine whether the vaccine is effective. “Final vaccine efficacy data will be shared once available,” the companies said.

In the Phase 2/3 trial, a third dose of the vaccine was given to 1,678 children “at least two months after the second dose at a time when Omicron was the predominant variant.” The third dose appeared to elicit an antibody response enough to meet the FDA criteria for emergency use of the vaccine, the companies said.

“Three 3-µg doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine was well-tolerated in this age group, and no new safety signals were identified,” they added. “The majority of adverse events were mild or moderate.”

Albert Bourla, Pfizer’s chairman and CEO, said that the company is “pleased” that the vaccine “was well tolerated and produced a strong immune response.”

Ugur Sahin, CEO and co-founder of BioNTech, said that the study suggests that the vaccine “provides young children with a high level of protection against the recent COVID-19 strains.”

Children aged 5 and under comprise the only age group in the United States currently not FDA-eligible for any COVID-19 vaccination.

A poll from the Kaiser Family Foundation in April found that “[o]ne in five parents of children under 5 [18 percent] are eager to vaccinate their child and say they will do so right away once a COVID-19 vaccine is authorized for their age group.”

The FDA announced Wednesday that it would hold a meeting on June 15 for its independent advisory panel, the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, to discuss the EUA request from Pfizer.

The same committee on June 15 will also be discussing Moderna’s EUA application for the company’s vaccine, intended for those 6 months to under 6 years old.

Moderna is seeking authorization for a two-dose regimen of its vaccine, each containing 25 µg, which is a quarter of the dose for those aged 12 and above (100 μg) in the primary course of the vaccine.

The vaccine’s effectiveness in preventing infection, including asymptomatic and mild infection, from the SARS-CoV-2 virus for those aged 6 months to 2 years was only 51 percent, and for those aged 2 to under-6 years was 37 percent, Moderna said in late April.

The vaccines from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna are both based on mRNA technology. The COVID-19 vaccines from these companies have been linked with heart inflammation, including myocarditis and pericarditis, cumulative data from around the world have suggested.

Younger populations, especially young men, have been observed to experience these conditions at much higher than expected rates, data from the CDC previously suggested. A small number of deaths from heart inflammation after COVID-19 vaccine have been reported.

Liz Mumper, a pediatrician and former medical director of the Autism Research Institute, told the Children’s Health Defense in an interview that natural immunity provides a much more durable and broader protection for children than vaccines.

She also said that if a child contracts COVID-19, they not only don’t need the vaccine but also might be at higher risk of adverse effects if they are made to take them.

“If kids don’t need the vaccines, we do not want to give them the vaccines because we do not have long-term studies on the side effects, and the short-term information we have is actually quite a bit concerning to me,” Mumper said. The interview host pointed out that the COVID-19 survival rate among children is 99.98 percent.

Vaccine manufacturers are immune from liability for any adverse reactions—unless there’s “willful misconduct” involved. Vaccine providers are required to report any serious adverse effects or vaccination administration errors to VAERS, hosted by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

The federal government has a countermeasures program that can compensate eligible persons who suffer serious injury from approved vaccines. But the burden of proof has proven a challenging process.

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

• Canadian immunologist and vaccine researcher Byram Bridle, Ph.D., has gained access to Pfizer’s biodistribution study from the Japanese regulatory agency. The research demonstrates a huge problem with all COVID-19 vaccines
• The assumption that vaccine developers have been working with is that the mRNA in the vaccines would primarily remain in and around the vaccination site. Pfizer’s data, however, show the mRNA and subsequent spike protein are widely distributed in the body within hours
• This is a serious problem, as the spike protein is a toxin shown to cause cardiovascular and neurological damage. It also has reproductive toxicity, and Pfizer’s biodistribution data show it accumulates in women’s ovaries
• Once in your blood circulation, the spike protein binds to platelet receptors and the cells that line your blood vessels. When that happens, it can cause platelets to clump together, resulting in blood clots, and/or cause abnormal bleeding
• Pfizer documents submitted to the European Medicines Agency also show the company failed to follow industry-standard quality management practices during preclinical toxicology studies and that key studies did not meet good laboratory practice standards

The more we learn about the COVID-19 vaccines, the worse they look. In a recent interview[1] with Alex Pierson (above), Canadian immunologist and vaccine researcher Byram Bridle, Ph.D., dropped a shocking truth bomb that immediately went viral, despite being censored by Google.

It also was featured in a “fact” check by The Poynter Institute’s Politifact,[2] which pronounced Bridle’s findings as “false” after interviewing Dr. Drew Weissman,[3] a UPenn scientist who is credited with helping to create the technology that enables the COVID mRNA vaccines to work. But, as you can see below, unlike Bridle, Politifact neglected to go beyond interviewing someone with such a huge stake in the vaccine’s success.

In 2020, Bridle was awarded a $230,000 government grant for research on COVID vaccine development. As part of that research, he and a team of international scientists requested a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) access to Pfizer’s biodistribution study from the Japanese regulatory agency. The research,[4] [5]previously unseen, demonstrates a huge problem with all COVID-19 vaccines.

“We made a big mistake,” Bridle says. “We thought the spike protein was a great target antigen; we never knew the spike protein itself was a toxin and was a pathogenic protein. So, by vaccinating people we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin.”

Pfizer Omitted Industry-Standard Safety Studies

What’s more, TrialSite News reports[6] that Pfizer documents submitted to the European Medicines Agency [EMA] reveal the company “did not follow industry-standard quality management practices during preclinical toxicology studies … as key studies did not meet good laboratory practice (GLP).”

Neither reproductive toxicity nor genotoxicity (DNA mutation) studies were performed, both of which are considered critical when developing a new drug or vaccine for human use. The problems now surfacing matter greatly, as they significantly alter the risk-benefit analysis underlying the vaccines’ emergency use authorization. As reported by TrialSite News:[7]

“Recently, there has been speculation regarding potential safety signals associated with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Many different unusual, prolonged, or delayed reactions have been reported, and often these are more pronounced after the second shot.

Women have reported changes in menstruation after taking mRNA vaccines. Problems with blood clotting (coagulation) — which are also common during COVID-19 disease — are also reported. In the case of the Pfizer COVID mRNA vaccine, these newly revealed documents raise additional questions about both the genotoxicity and reproductive toxicity risks of this product.

Standard studies designed to assess these risks were not performed in compliance with accepted empirical research standards. Furthermore, in key studies designed to test whether the vaccine remains near the injection site or travels throughout the body, Pfizer did not even use the commercial vaccine (BNT162b2) but instead relied on a ‘surrogate’ mRNA producing the luciferase protein.

These new disclosures seem to indicate that the U.S. and other governments are conducting a massive vaccination program with an incompletely characterized experimental vaccine.

It is certainly understandable why the vaccine was rushed into use as an experimental product under emergency use authority, but these new findings suggest that routine quality testing issues were overlooked in the rush to authorize use.

People are now receiving injections with an mRNA gene therapy-based vaccine, which produces the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in their cells, and the vaccine may be also delivering the mRNA and producing spike protein in unintended organs and tissues (which may include ovaries).”

Toxic Spike Protein Enters Blood Circulation

The assumption that vaccine developers have been working with is that the mRNA in the vaccines (or DNA in the case of Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca’s vaccines) would primarily remain in and around the vaccination site, i.e., your deltoid muscle, with a small amount draining into local lymph nodes.[8]

Pfizer’s data, however, show this isn’t the case at all. Using mRNA programmed to produce luciferase protein, as well as mRNA tagged with a radioactive label, Pfizer showed that the majority of the mRNA initially remain near the injection site, but within hours become widely distributed within the body.[9]

We have known for a long time that the spike protein is a pathogenic protein. It is a toxin. It can cause damage in our body if it gets into circulation.

— Dr. Byram Bridle

The mRNA enters your bloodstream and accumulates in a variety of organs, primarily your spleen, bone marrow, liver, adrenal glands and, in women, the ovaries. The spike protein also travel to your heart, brain and lungs, where bleeding and or blood clots can occur as a result, and is expelled in breast milk.

This is a problem, because rather than instructing your muscle cells to produce the spike protein (the antigen that triggers antibody production), spike protein is actually being produced inside your blood vessel walls and various organs, where it can do a great deal of damage.

“It’s the first time ever scientists have been privy to seeing where these messenger RNA [mRNA] vaccines go after vaccination,” Bridle told Pierson.[10]

“Is it a safe assumption that it stays in the shoulder muscle? The short answer is: absolutely not. It’s very disconcerting … We have known for a long time that the spike protein is a pathogenic protein.

It is a toxin. It can cause damage in our body if it gets into circulation … The spike protein on its own is almost entirely responsible for the damage to the cardiovascular system, if it gets into circulation.”

The Spike Protein Is the Problem

Indeed, for many months, we’ve known that the worst symptoms of severe COVID-19, blood clotting problems in particular, are caused by the spike protein of the virus. As such, it seemed really risky to instruct the body’s cells to produce the very thing that causes severe problems.

Bridle cites research showing that laboratory animals injected with purified spike protein from SARS-CoV-2 straight into their bloodstream developed cardiovascular problems and brain damage.

Assuming that the spike protein would not enter into the circulatory system was a “grave mistake,” according to Bridle, who calls the Japanese data “clear-cut evidence” that the vaccine, and the spike protein produced by it, enters your bloodstream and accumulates in vital organs. Bridle also cites recent research showing the spike protein remained in the bloodstream of humans for 29 days.

Once in your blood circulation, the spike protein binds to platelet receptors and the cells that line your blood vessels. As explained by Bridle, when that happens, one of several things can occur:

1. It can cause platelets to clump together — Platelets, aka thrombocytes, are specialized cells in your blood that stop bleeding. When there’s blood vessel damage, they clump together to form a blood clot. This is why we’ve been seeing clotting disorders associated with both COVID-19 and the vaccines
2. It can cause abnormal bleeding
3. In your heart, it can cause heart problems
4. In your brain, it can cause neurological damage

Importantly, people who have been vaccinated against COVID-19 absolutely should not donate blood, seeing how the vaccine and the spike protein are both transferred. In fragile patients receiving the blood, the damage could be lethal.

Breastfeeding women also need to know that both the vaccine and the spike protein are being expelled in breast milk, and this could be lethal for their babies. You are not transferring antibodies. You are transferring the vaccine itself, as well as the spike protein, which could result in bleeding and/or blood clots in your child. All of this also suggests that for individuals who are at low risk for COVID-19, children and teens in particular, the risks of these vaccines far outweigh the benefits.

The Spike Protein and Blood Clotting

In related news, Dr. Malcolm Kendrick posted an article[11] on his website June 3, 2021, in which he discusses the links between the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and vasculitis, a medical term referring to inflammation (“itis”) in your vascular system, which is made up of your heart and blood vessels.

There are many different types of vasculitis, including Kawasaki’s disease, antiphospholipid syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, scleroderma and Sjogren’s disease. According to Kendrick, all of them have two things in common:[12]

1.Your body for some reason starts to attack the lining of your blood vessels, thereby causing damage and inflammation — The “why” can differ from one case to another, but in all cases, your immune system identifies something foreign in the lining of the blood vessel, causing it to attack. The attack causes damage to the lining, which results in inflammation.

Blood clots are a common result, and can occur either because the platelets clump together in response to the vessel wall damage, or because your anticlotting mechanism has been compromised. Your most powerful anticlotting system is your glycocalyx, the protective layer of glycoproteins that lines your blood vessels.

Among many other things, the glycocalyx contains a wide variety of anticoagulant factors, including tissue factor inhibitor, protein C, nitric oxide and antithrombin. It also modulates the adhesion of platelets to the endothelium. When blood clots completely block a blood vessel, you end up with a stroke or a heart attack.

A reduction in platelet count, known as thrombocytopenia, is a reliable sign that blood clots are forming in your system, as the platelets are being used up in the process. Thrombocytopenia is a commonly-reported side effect of COVID-19 vaccines, as are blood clots, strokes and lethal heart attacks — all of which are pointing toward spike proteins causing vascular damage.

2.They significantly increase your risk of death, in some cases raising mortality by 50 times compared to people who do not have these conditions.

The take-home message Kendrick delivers is that “If you damage the lining of blood vessel walls, blood clots are far more likely to form. Very often, the damage is caused by the immune system going on the attack, damaging blood vessel walls, and removing several of the anti-clotting mechanisms.” The end result can be lethal, and this chain of events is exactly what these COVID-19 vaccines are setting into motion.

SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein May Damage Mitochondrial Function

Other research suggests the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein can have a serious impact on your mitochondrial function, which is imperative for good health, innate immunity and disease prevention of all kinds.

When the spike protein interacts with the ACE2 receptor, it can disrupt mitochondrial signaling, thereby inducing the production of reactive oxygen species and oxidative stress. If the damage is serious enough, uncontrolled cell death can occur, which in turn leaks mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) into your bloodstream.[13]

Aside from being detected in cases involving acute tissue injury, heart attack and sepsis, freely circulating mtDNA has also been shown to contribute to a number of chronic diseases, including systemic inflammatory response syndrome or SIRS, heart disease, liver failure, HIV infection, rheumatoid arthritis and certain cancers.[14] As explained in “COVID-19: A Mitochondrial Perspective”:[15]

“Apart from its role in energy production, mitochondria are crucial for … innate immunity, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, and apoptosis; all of these are important in COVID-19 pathogenesis. Dysfunctional mitochondria predispose to oxidative stress and loss of cellular function and vitality. In addition, mitochondrial damage leads to … inappropriate and persistent inflammation.

SARS coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) … enters cell by attaching to angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors on cell surface … Following infection, there is internalization and downregulation of ACE2 receptors.

At vascular endothelium, ACE2 performs conversion of angiotensin II to angiotensin (1–7). Thus, a low ACE2 activity subsequent to SARS-CoV-2 infection leads to imbalance in renin-angiotensin system with relative excess of angiotensin II.

Angiotensin II through binding to its type 1 receptors exerts pro-inflammatory, vasoconstrictive, and prothrombotic effects, while angiotensin (1–7) has opposing effects … In addition, angiotensin II increases cytoplasmic and mitochondrial ROS generation leading to oxidative stress.

Increased oxidative stress may lead to endothelial dysfunction and aggravate systemic and local inflammation, thus contributing to acute lung injury, cytokine storm, and thrombosis seen in severe COVID-19 illness …

A recent algorithm showed that majority of SARS-CoV-2 genomic and structural RNAs are targeted for mitochondrial matrix. Thus it appears that SARS-CoV-2 hijacks mitochondrial machinery for its own benefit, including DMV biogenesis. Manipulation of mitochondria by virus may lead to mitochondrial dysfunction and increased oxidative stress ultimately leading to loss of mitochondrial integrity and cell death …

Mitochondrial fission enables removal of the damaged portion of a mitochondrion to be cleared by mitophagy (a special form of autophagy). Metabolomic studies suggest that SARS-CoV-2 inhibits mitophagy. Thus, there is accumulation of damaged and dysfunctional mitochondria. This not only leads to impaired MAVS [mitochondrial antiviral signaling] response but also aggravates inflammation and cell death.”

The author, Pankaj Prasun, points out that the virus’ impact on mitochondria helps explain why COVID-19 is so much deadlier for older people, the obese, and those with diabetes, high blood pressure and heart disease.

All of these risk factors have something in common: They’re all associated with mitochondrial dysfunction. If your mitochondria are already dysfunctional, the SARS-CoV-2 virus can more easily knock out more mitochondria, resulting in severe illness and death.

The Spike Protein Is a Bioweapon

In my interview with Seneff and Mikovits, they both stressed that the key danger — both in COVID-19 and with the vaccines — is the spike protein itself. However, while the spike protein found in the virus is bad, the spike protein your body produces in response to the vaccine is far worse. Why?

Because the synthetic mRNA in the vaccine has been programmed to instruct your cells to produce an unnatural, genetically engineered spike protein. Specific alterations make it far more toxic than that found on the virus itself. Mikovits goes so far as to call the spike protein a bioweapon, as it is a disease-causing agent that demolishes innate immunity and exhausts your natural killer (NK) cells’ ability to determine which cells are infected and which aren’t.

In short, when you get the COVID-19 vaccine, you are being injected with an agent that instructs your body to produce the bioweapon in its own cells. This is about as diabolical as it gets.

In her paper, “Worse Than The Disease: Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19,” published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research in collaboration with Dr. Greg Nigh,[16] Seneff explains why the unnatural spike protein is so problematic.

In summary, normally, the spike protein on a virus will collapse on itself and fall into the cell once it attaches to the ACE2 receptor. The vaccine-induced spike protein does not do this. Instead it stays open and remains attached to the ACE2 receptor, thereby disabling it and causing a host of problems that lead to heart, lung and immune impairment.

What’s more, because the RNA code has been enriched with extra guanines (Gs) and cytosines (Cs), and configured as if it’s a human messenger RNA molecule ready to make protein by adding a polyA tail, the spike protein’s RNA sequence in the vaccine looks as if it is part bacteria,[17]part human[18] and part viral at the same time.

There’s also evidence suggesting the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein may be a prion, which is yet another piece of really bad news, particularly as it pertains to vaccine-induced spike protein. Prions are membrane proteins and when they misfold, they form crystals in the cytoplasm resulting in prion disease.

Since the mRNA in the vaccines has been modified to spew out very high amounts of spike protein (far greater than that of the actual virus), the risk of excessive buildup in the cytoplasm is high. And, since the spike protein doesn’t enter into the membrane of the cell, there’s a high risk that it can become problematic if indeed it works like a prion.

Remember, the research cited by Bridle at the beginning of this article found the spike protein accumulates in the spleen, among other places. Parkinson’s disease is a prion disease that has been traced back to prions originating in the spleen, that then travel up to the brain via the vagus nerve. In the same way, it’s quite possible COVID-19 vaccines may promote Parkinson’s and other human prion diseases such as Alzheimer’s.

What Are the Solutions?

While all of this is highly problematic, there is help. As noted by Mikovits, remedies to the maladies that might develop post-vaccination include:

• Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin treatments. Ivermectin appears particularly promising as it actually binds to the spike protein. Please listen to the interview that Brett Weinstein did with Dr. Pierre Kory,[19] one of Dr. Paul Marik’s collaborators
• Low-dose antiretroviral therapy to reeducate your immune system
• Low-dose interferons such as Paximune, developed by interferon researcher Dr. Joe Cummins, to stimulate your immune system
• Peptide T (an HIV entry inhibitor derived from the HIV envelope protein gp120; it blocks binding and infection of viruses that use the CCR5 receptor to infect cells)
• Cannabis, to strengthen Type I interferon pathways
• Dimethylglycine or betaine (trimethylglycine) to enhance methylation, thereby suppressing latent viruses
• Silymarin or milk thistle to help cleanse your liver

From my perspective, I believe the best thing you can do is to build your innate immune system. To do that, you need to become metabolically flexible and optimize your diet. You’ll also want to make sure your vitamin D level is optimized to between 60 ng/mL and 80 ng/mL (100 nmol/L to 150 nmol/L), ideally through sensible sun exposure. Sunlight also has other benefits besides making vitamin D.

Use time-restricted eating and eat all your meals for the day within a six- to eight-hour window. Avoid all vegetable oils and processed foods. Focus on certified-organic foods to minimize your glyphosate exposure, and include plenty of sulfur-rich foods to keep your mitochondria and lysosomes healthy. Both are important for the clearing of cellular debris, including these spike proteins. You can also boost your sulfate by taking Epsom salt baths.

To combat the toxicity of the spike protein, you’ll want to optimize autophagy, which may help digest and remove the spike proteins. Time-restricted eating will upregulate autophagy, while sauna therapy, which upregulates heat shock proteins, will help refold misfolded proteins and also tag damaged proteins and target them for removal. It is important that your sauna is hot enough (around 170 degrees Fahrenheit) and does not have high magnetic or electric fields.

The U.S. Food and Drug advisory committee on Wednesday voted in favor of authorizing the use of Moderna’s experimental Covid-19 vaccine for children 6 months through 5 years of age.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) conducted a meeting of its Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) to discuss the Moderna EUA request for a COVID-19 vaccine for 6 months through 5 years of age and Pfizer-BioNTech EUA request for 6 months through 4 years of age.

The U.S. Food and Drug advisory committee on Wednesday voted in favor of authorizing the use of Moderna’s experimental Covid-19 vaccine for children 6 months through 5 years of age.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) conducted a meeting of its Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) to discuss the Moderna EUA request for a COVID-19 vaccine for 6 months through 5 years of age and Pfizer-BioNTech EUA request for 6 months through 4 years of age.

The recommendation was the first of two votes called by the FDA vaccine advisors. Later this afternoon, the same committee will also evaluate the experimental Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine for children ages 6 months to 4 years.

“All 21 members of the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee voted “yes” in response to the question: Based on the totality of scientific evidence available, do the benefits of the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine when administered as a 2-dose series (25 micrograms each dose) outweigh its risks for use in infants and children 6 months through 5 years of age?” CNN reported.

“The FDA, which typically follows the committee’s decisions, will now decide whether to authorize the vaccine for emergency use in this young age group,” the news site added.

FDA advisors voted 21-0 to authorize Moderna’s vaccine for children 6 months old to 5 years old. The Nordic countries (Germany, France, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and Finland) all paused the use of Moderna for people under 30 due to concerns around rare cardiovascular side effects. But in the US, the FDA advisors believed the benefits of experimental shot outweigh its risks for use in infants and children 6 months through 5 years.

According to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) data, 49,283 adverse events were reported for ages 5-17 through June 3, 2022, after receiving the Moderna vaccine.

The FDA discussed one of the confirmed cases linked to the side effects of mRNA products from clinical trials for babies. A one-year-old baby suffered multiple seizures but continued in the trial to receive the 2nd dose.

Below is the data about the febrile seizure based on the presentation today. The child had a subsequent seizure associated with another fever approximately six weeks later. The child has remained in the study and received another dose of the vaccine. The other three events occurred 10 to 66 days after vaccination and were not considered related by the investigators, according to Rituparna Das, the Vice President of the Clinical Development COVID-19 Vaccines Moderna.

The clinical trials enrolled 6,607 individuals from 6 months to 5 years. 5,011 participants received one dose of Moderna vaccine (mRNA1273), 1,911 participants (6-23 months) and 3,100 (2-5 years).

Safety endpoints included solicited, local, and systemic adverse reactions, which were collected seven days post-vaccination. All unsolicited events were captured for 28 days after each vaccination, serious adverse events (SAE), Medically Attended AEs (MAAEs), and adverse events of special interests were followed throughout the entire study.

Below are the data for Solicited Local Reactions within 7 Days After Dose 1 and 2 for infants and toddlers (6-23 months) and young children (2-5 years).  The figure below showed that pain was the most common event, with similar rates and severity following dose one and dose two. Looking at infants and toddlers, the pain was again the most common local adverse reaction.

Reactions were evaluated according to age. Young children’s events (37 months to 5 years) included fever, headache, fatigue, myalgia, arthralgia, nausea, vomiting, and chills.

For infants and toddlers, events included fever, irritability, crying, sleepiness, and loss of appetite.

Headache and fatigue were the most common systemic adverse reactions among children 37 months to five years.

Below are the Unsolicited adverse events in young children (2-5 Years)and infants and toddlers (6-23 Months) up to 28 Days after any injection.

Studies suggest a link between an incurable and fatal prion disease known as Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD) and COVID-19 vaccines.

Researchers believe the prion region from the original Wuhan COVID-19 variant’s spike protein was incorporated into mRNA vaccines and adenovirus vector vaccines — given to hundreds of millions of humans — and that it can cause a new type of rapidly progressing sporadic CJD.

According to Mayo Clinic, CJD is a degenerative brain disorder that leads to dementia and, ultimately, death.

Although the Omicron variant does not have a prion region on its spike protein, current COVID-19 vaccines still use the genetic material — including the prion region — of the parent Wuhan strain.

A French pre-print paper published in May on CJD and COVID-19 vaccination identified a new form of sporadic CJD that occurred within days of receiving a first or second dose of Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 vaccines.

 Researchers analyzed 26 cases of CJD and found the first symptoms appeared on average 11.38 days after injection with a COVID-19 vaccine.

Of the 26 cases, 20 had died by the time the study was published and six were still alive.

“The 20 deaths occurred only 4.76 months after the injection. Among them, 8 of them lead to sudden death (2.5 months),” researchers wrote.

“This confirms the radically different nature of this new form of CJD, whereas the classic form requires several decades,” wrote the researchers.

Dr. Jean-Claude Perez, lead author of the French study, on June 6 told The Epoch Times that all 26 cases resulted in death.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), prion diseases are a family of rare progressive neurodegenerative disorders that affect humans and animals. Prion diseases are usually rapidly progressive and always fatal.

Although prions occur naturally in the brain and are usually harmless, they can become diseased or misfolded, affecting nearby prions and causing them to become misshapen.

 The abnormal folding of the prion proteins “leads to brain damage and the characteristic signs and symptoms of the disease,” the CDC’s website states.

Sporadic CJD occurs when a person becomes infected for no apparent reason. Once a single prion becomes infected, it will progress to other prions, and there is no treatment capable of stopping it.

Prion Area of Original Wuhan Strain Spike Protein Present in All COVID Vaccines Can Interact With Human Cells

Although the Omicron variant does not have a prion region on its spike protein, French researchers said other COVID-19 variants, including the parent Wuhan strain used in currently administered vaccines, do.

“We are now studying the very first cases of patients with Omicron, in South

Africa, Europe and the USA and Canada in particular,” the researchers wrote. “In ALL of these cases, the Prion region has disappeared.”

 However, the Wuhan variant’s spike protein gene information — including its prion region — was integrated into the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines and the AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson adenovirus vector vaccines.

“We have also demonstrated […] that the Spikes of the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA injections also contain this same Prion region,” the researchers wrote. “The same is true of ALL the other SARS-CoV2 vaccines since ALL are made from the Spike sequence of SARS-CoV2 from Wuhan, which we have demonstrated contains the Prion region.”

With mRNA vaccines, once mRNA is incorporated into the cells, the cell turns mRNA instructions into a COVID-19 spike protein that tricks the cells into believing it has been infected so the body will create an immunological memory against a piece of the virus.

With adenovirus vector vaccines, the DNA of the spike protein is carried into the cell through an adenovirus vector and then into the nucleus where all human DNA is stored. Once there, DNA is transcribed into mRNA and made into the spike protein.

A U.S. study published in Microorganisms in January 2022 showed the prion area of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein incorporated into COVID-19 vaccines is able to interact with human cells.

Although the CDC says COVID-19 vaccines cannot “alter your DNA,” studies show mRNA can be changed into DNA and incorporated into the human genome.

 A U.S. study speculated that a misfolded spike protein could create a misfolded prion region that may be able to interact with healthy prions to cause damage, leading to CJD disease.

A peer-reviewed case report published in Turkey and the French preprint identified sudden CJD cases appearing following vaccination with the Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca vaccines, suggesting links between getting vaccinated and the disease.

A study published last year in Microbiology & Infectious Diseases found a potential link between Pfizer’s vaccine and prion disease in humans.

Despite the existence of new SARS-COV-2 variants, people are still receiving the original COVID-19 vaccines developed with the parent Wuhan variant’s spike protein.

Numerous Cases of CJD Reported in the U.S.

A U.S. case report in March highlighted 64-year-old Cheryl Cohen’s battle with CJD, which developed within days of her second dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.

 The report stated:

“Here, we highlight a case of a 64-year-old woman who presents with rapidly declining memory loss, behavior changes, headaches and gait disturbance approximately one week following administration of the second dose of the novel Pfizer-BioNTech messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccine.

“After extensive investigation, conclusive evidence identified the fatal diagnosis of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.”

In an exclusive interview with The Defender in Aug. 2021, Cohen’s daughter, Gianni, said her mother’s regression was “mind-blowing, confusing and truly heartbreaking.”

She went from being able to work and do normal everyday activities to being unable to walk, speak or control her body’s movement, Gianni said. Cohen felt as if her head was “going to explode” and died within three months of receiving her second dose of Pfizer.

In a written statement to The Defender, her physician said:

 “This case identifies potential adverse events that could occur with the administration of the novel COVID-19 vaccine. Moreover, clinicians need to consider neurodegenerative diseases such as prion disease (e.g. sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease), autoimmune encephalitis, infection, non-epileptic seizure, toxic-metabolic disorders, etc. in their differential diagnoses when a patient presents with rapidly progressive dementia, particularly in the setting of recent vaccination.

“Although there is currently no cure for sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD), early diagnosis is crucial to avoid the unnecessary administration of empiric medications for suspected psychological or neurological disorders.

“Furthermore, tracking adverse events could potentially lead to further characterization and understanding of both the novel COVID-19 messenger ribonucleic nucleic acid (mRNA) vaccine as well as the etiology of sCJD.

“More importantly, recognizing adverse effects provides individuals with vital information to make a more educated decision regarding their health.”

In another exclusive interview with The Defender, Jeffrey Beauchine said his mother, Carol, knew her Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease was related to the Moderna shot. Watching her death was like “something you see out of a movie,” he said.

Beauchine said his mother received her first dose of Moderna on Feb. 16, 2021, and didn’t report any complaints. After getting the second dose on March 17, Carol immediately said she “felt different.”

Carol’s symptoms began with numbness that spread from the arm in which she received her injection to the entire left side of her body.

She complained that something was wrong with her brain, couldn’t put thoughts together or make sense of things, developed double vision and blindness and began to experience hallucinations.

Doctors initially thought Carol had suffered a stroke or anxiety. Scans later showed there were abnormalities with her cerebellum.

Carol’s condition progressed rapidly, and she was eventually diagnosed with CJD and given days to live. She died within months of receiving her second dose of Moderna.

Carol’s doctors filed a report with the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS I.D. 2180699).

To date, the CDC has not reached out to the family despite an autopsy confirming her death was caused by CJD — a condition she did not have prior to receiving her COVID-19 vaccine.

 In another exclusive interview with The Defender, Richard Sprague said his wife, Jennifer, developed CJD after the Pfizer COVID-19 shot and died within five months of the second dose.

Jennifer received the first dose of Pfizer on Aug. 29, 2021, and her second dose on Sept. 21, 2021. Although her husband remained unvaccinated, Jennifer was required to get vaccinated as part of her employment.

Four days after the second dose, Jennifer experienced her first episode of a “sudden strange event she couldn’t explain.”

Jennifer started having more episodes and her left hand and side began to tremble. On Oct. 13, 2021, Jennifer went back to the doctor, who prescribed Xanax for anxiety.

Jennifer’s disease progressed rapidly until she was unable to sit up and walk independently. Scans confirmed Jennifer had significant changes on the right side of her brain. A new medical team performed a spinal tab and confirmed Jennifer had CJD. By this time, Jennifer was unable to get out of bed.

“Your brain is just disappearing. It’s crazy,” Sprague said. “You’re in this perfect healthy body and your brain just dies within the course of a few months.”

 After Jennifer was diagnosed with CJD on Feb. 12, her insurance company said it would no longer pay for her care and Sprague was told his wife would not recover.

Jennifer died on Feb. 21 — five months after receiving her second dose of Pfizer.

According to the latest data from VAERS, 56 cases of rapid-onset CJD have been reported following COVID-19 vaccines since Dec. 14, 2021.

Historically, VAERS has been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events.

“it’s so corrupt, it’s mind-blowing… it’s clear under the law, you cannot force or mandate someone to take an emergency use authorized drug.”

While there aren’t many people around the world who haven’t heard of the COVID-19 drug that wasn’t promoted as the best option at fighting the coronavirus, not many know that it was also marketed as Comirnaty. According to the FDA, “On August 23, 2021, FDA announced the first approval of a COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and will now be marketed as Comirnaty, for the prevention of COVID-19 in individuals 16 years of age and older.” That might not sound suspicious, but attorney Thomas Renz, who has been a critic of the COVID-19 agenda, noted how Pfizer can’t make Comirnaty.

Appearing on His Glory, Renz used a statement from Pfizer to show how the COVID-19 drug that was used on military soldiers was illegal. In the video below, he said, “I’m quoting here – Pfizer received the initial FDA BLA license on 8/23/2021 for its COVID 19 vaccine for use in individuals 16 and older.

At that time, FDA published a BLA package insert that included the approved new COVID-19 vaccine trade name Comirnaty and listed two new NDCs and images of labels with the new trade name. This is what’s important. These NDC will not be manufactured. Only NDCs for the subsequently BLA approved tri sucrose formulation will be produced.”

Knowing that the wording and terms can be confusing, Renz added, “What that means in English is that Pfizer is just admitting they didn’t make Comirnaty. They’re not going to make any Comirnaty. This whole Comirnaty licensing was a load of crap to try and convince people to get these jabs. And so, when the military is saying that, you know, they can force these jabs on their soldiers because they’re licensed, they’re lying because they’re not available, and the military knows it. And the military is the one who’s contracted with Pfizer to get these jabs.”

As mentioned above, the attorney also explained how it made the COVID-19 jab in the military illegal. “See, one of the dirty secrets is everybody thinks that all this was done through DHHS, it appears now, and we’re just finding this out, that this is being done through the military so that they can dodge licensing and procurement requirements. It’s so corrupt. It’s mind-blowing. And this here demonstrates, because it’s clear under the law, you cannot force or mandate someone to take an emergency use authorized drug.”

Renz, having witnessed the fraud and corruption surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic, admitted and warned, “The Biden administration is so corrupt from top to bottom. I mean, there should be impeachment. There should be trials. And there should probably be a lot of jail time for a lot of people. You’re going to try and get this put on the childhood vaccine schedule, and you can’t go to school without getting it. They’re going to try and have that happen. So, we have got to take a stand on this. We’ve got to stop this. It’s the safety of your kids, and it’s our future.”

Former CBS Healthwatch reporter Jon Rappaport has been reporting on the non-proven-to-exist SARS-CoV-2 for some time.  He’s also pointing out numerous smoking guns related to the COVID shot, fraudulently termed a “vaccine.”  Now, he’s uncovered another COVID shot smoking gun in the great CONvid-1984 “scamdemic.”

I’m going to start with a bizarre analogy, which illustrates the folly called vaccination.

A boy of 16 who lives on a farm has been driving vehicles all over the land since he was 11. He’s driven cars, trucks, and tractors. He’s driven them on roads, across fields, and on many occasions with his father beside him, he’s driven cars and trucks on city streets and highways. The boy knows how to drive. He’s a pro.

But when he turns 16, his father is on vacation, and his uncle comes to stay with the family. The uncle is quite insane. He tells the boy, “I’m going to put you through a training course in driving. It’s a rehearsal for the real thing.”

Against the protests of the boy, the uncle sits him in a closed car, which is specially equipped to pump amphetamines into the air. The uncle says, “The drug will make you more alert when you drive. So you’ll have enhanced skills. You’ll become a better driver with this rehearsal…so when you actually get your license, you’ll be ready for the real thing…”

“But I can already drive better than you can,” the boy says.

“Shut up,” his uncle tells him.

I call vaccination a rehearsal because that’s what it’s supposed to be.

The immune system is tuned up for the possible later appearance of “the real thing.”

For the moment, put aside the fact that SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t exist and therefore a vaccine is entirely irrelevant.

For the many who believe in the virus, here’s a question. Why does the use of a vaccine, as a rehearsal for the real thing, make any sense at all?

If the immune system springs into action against the virus (or a virus protein) in the vaccine, why wouldn’t it also spring into action when the virus shows up naturally? What’s the point of the prior rehearsal? Isn’t the body already ready for the real thing?

It turns out there is a medical answer. Vaccines contain various substances called adjuvants. Their function is to enhance the immune response during the rehearsal, better preparing it for the moment when the real thing comes along.

COVID RNA vaccines contain an adjuvant called PEG. Polyethylene glycol.

However, as many scientists know, PEG can cause a dangerous anaphylactic reaction. Not good.

Why does PEG cause that reaction?

Because antibodies over-respond to PEG.

Think it through. The body’s immune system isn’t being enhanced during the rehearsal called vaccination. The adjuvant (PEG) isn’t causing the immune system antibodies to ramp up against the spike protein in the virus. The adjuvant is causing the immune system to attack it, the adjuvant.

Oops.

Therefore, what good is the vaccine?

And we’re not just talking about the adjuvant called PEG. By implication, this anaphylactic response suggests that ALL adjuvants in all vaccines aren’t really enhancing the immune response against viruses. Instead, they’re provoking antibody reactions to themselves, the adjuvants.

In which case, I return to my original question: why bother with the rehearsal called vaccination, since it proves nothing except the body is already prepared for the real thing. And so the vaccination wasn’t needed.

Here are excerpts from an article in Science (12/21/20), “Suspicions grow that nanoparticles in Pfizer’s COVID vaccine [and Moderna’s] trigger rare allergic reactions.” You can plow through and dig out the nuggets that, taken together, illustrate what I’ve just presented.

The caps in the following quotes are mine.

“Severe allergy-like reactions in at least eight people who received the COVID-19 vaccine produced by Pfizer and BioNTech [Pfizer] over the past 2 weeks may be due to a compound in the packaging of the messenger RNA (mRNA) that forms the vaccine’s main ingredient, scientists say. A similar mRNA vaccine developed by Moderna, which was authorized for emergency use in the United States on Friday, also contains the compound, polyethylene glycol (PEG).”

“PEG has never been used before in an approved vaccine, but it is found in many drugs that have occasionally triggered anaphylaxis—a potentially life-threatening reaction that can cause rashes, a plummeting blood pressure, shortness of breath, and a fast heartbeat. Some allergists and immunologists believe a small number of people previously exposed to PEG may have HIGH LEVELS OF ANTIBODIES AGAINST PEG, putting them at risk of an anaphylactic reaction to the vaccine.”

“The two vaccines both contain mRNA wrapped in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) that help carry it to human cells, BUT ALSO ACT AS AN ADJUVANT, A VACCINE INGREDIENT THAT BOLSTERS THE IMMUNE RESPONSE. The LNPs are ‘PEGylated’—chemically attached to PEG molecules that cover the outside of the particles and increase their stability and life span.”

“PEGs were long thought to be biologically inert, but a growing body of evidence suggests they are not. As much as 72% of people have at least SOME ANTIBODIES AGAINST PEGs, according to a 2016 study led by Samuel Lai, a pharmaco-engineer at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, presumably as a result of exposure to cosmetics and pharmaceuticals. About 7% have a level that may be high enough to predispose them to anaphylactic reactions, he found.”

Boom.

It’s beginning to sound like this is a first for a lot of things for these mRNA shots.

When are the People going to have enough and start delivering justice to the traitors and criminals in our midst disguised as a benevolent government?

COVID vaccine injuries have been routinely downplayed by the public health regime and the bootlicking media since the vaccines came out. They have been saying that any potential side effects are “rare” and “mild,” despite the fact that significant numbers of people have developed myocarditis after taking the vaccine, and they have systematically buried any evidence that would contradict their narrative

“Studies show that myocarditis that came after one person’s body received the COVID-19 vaccine is a potentially life-threatening inflammation of the heart and it shouldn’t be treated like it’s a mild one just like how US public regime and the media are kept on saying. Especially when 90% of cases that have been recorded in VAERS ended up hospitalized.”

The public health regime’s claim that the condition is “rare” is completely false, as cases of myocarditis have skyrocketed in the U.S. since the rollout of the experimental vaccine, even in populations that aren’t typically as likely to develop the condition, such as children and young adults.

The Blaze broke down the VAERS numbers, writing:

“We are over a year into the known safety signals of this vaccine for myocarditis, and yet the shots still have not been pulled, even for younger males. In fact, it’s still a requirement in many colleges.

Yet reports of myocarditis and pericarditis are so prevalent now that just in the first eight weeks of 2022, we’re already at 47% of the total VAERS submissions for 2021. There were 24,177 reports of pericarditis/myocarditis submitted to VAERS in 2021. In 2022, just through Feb. 25, there were 11,289 reports, which is nearly half of last year’s total.”

“It’s not acceptable (and never was) for the media and the pharma-paid ‘fact checkers’ to automatically dismiss VAERS. It is our main pharmaco-surveillance tool and was put in place precisely to serve as the consolation to the public for Congress absolving vaccine manufactures of liability. Also, the data complements what we’ve learned universally from all the myocarditis vaccine studies – that it targets teens and early 20s more than other age groups and is more potent after the second dose.

The CDC’s own researchers published a study in JAMA in which they clinically confirmed most of the myocarditis submissions to VAERS. As such, they concluded, ‘Given the high verification rate of reports of myocarditis to VAERS after mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination, underreporting is more likely. Therefore, the actual rates of myocarditis per million doses of vaccine are likely higher than estimated.’”

The breakdown of myocarditis cases by age and number of doses of the COVID vaccine ⁠— 17 and 18-year-olds have the highest rate after receiving the second dose of the vaccines.

VAERS has recorded more than 20,000 deaths from cases of myocarditis, which is an astounding number for any vaccine. In the past, vaccines would have been pulled if they caused double-digit deaths, let alone tens of thousands of fatalities.

This data only proves that the mRNA Covid vaccine is by far the most dangerous vaccine ever recorded in VAERS. Yet, the Biden administration and the public health tyrants have been pushing everyone, including very young children, to take not one, not two, but three vaccines ⁠— with a fourth jab coming right around the corner.